Morgenthau planen
Re: "3.500 tyskbarn svältes medvetet ihjäl"
Ja, man kan kanske inte lita hundra på wikipedia men tycker att relativt ofta verkar stämma men detta kanske borde läggas i en annan tråd dessutom.
Så här står det i vilket fall på den engelska versionen
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthau_Plan)
Food policy
Main article: American food policy in occupied Germany
Germany was closed to relief shipments until December 1945. The given reasons were that they might tend to negate the policy of restricting the German standard of living. CARE package shipments to individuals remained prohibited until 5 June 1946. US troops and their families were also under orders to destroy their own excess food rather than letting German families have access to it.
In 1945 the German Red Cross, which during the war became thoroughly Nazified, and its head Ernst Grawitz was a major figure in medical experiments on Jews and "enemies of the state",[58] was dissolved,[59][60] and the International Red Cross and other international relief agencies were kept from helping ethnic Germans through strict controls on supplies and on travel.[61] The few agencies permitted to operate within Germany, such as the indigenous Caritas Verband, were not allowed to use imported supplies. When the Vatican attempted to transmit food supplies from Chile to German infants[59] the U.S. State Department forbade it.[59]
In early October 1945 the UK government privately acknowledged in a cabinet meeting that, German civilian adult death rates had risen to four times the pre-war levels and death rates amongst the German children had risen by 10 times the pre-war levels.[62] In early 1946 U.S. President Harry S. Truman finally bowed to pressure from Senators, Congress and public to allow foreign relief organization to enter Germany in order to review the food situation. In mid-1946 non-German relief organizations were finally permitted to help starving German children.[59] During 1946 the average German adult received less than 1,500 calories a day. 2,000 calories was then considered the minimum an individual can endure on for a limited period of time with reasonable health.[63] At this time food rationing was still strict in the UK and France and there were food shortages right across Europe. Bread rationing was first introduced to the UK in 1946 and potato rationing in 1947; these measures had not been in place during the war and partly reflect the need for food to be sent to the British and French zones of occupation.[64] However later research has revealed that the bread rationing in the UK was not necessary, it was in fact "not primarily for economic reasons – in order to save wheat – but for psychological and political reasons" as a political ploy in order to get US support in reconstruction funds and US wheat. Rationing did not reduce the level of food consumption in the UK.[65] In fact, the UK rationing let the UK "retain its privileged position as the only food importing country which did not suffer a significant reduction in calorie consumption."[65] The Germans in the UK zone were receiving half the UK ration.[65]
Så här står det i vilket fall på den engelska versionen
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthau_Plan)
Food policy
Main article: American food policy in occupied Germany
Germany was closed to relief shipments until December 1945. The given reasons were that they might tend to negate the policy of restricting the German standard of living. CARE package shipments to individuals remained prohibited until 5 June 1946. US troops and their families were also under orders to destroy their own excess food rather than letting German families have access to it.
In 1945 the German Red Cross, which during the war became thoroughly Nazified, and its head Ernst Grawitz was a major figure in medical experiments on Jews and "enemies of the state",[58] was dissolved,[59][60] and the International Red Cross and other international relief agencies were kept from helping ethnic Germans through strict controls on supplies and on travel.[61] The few agencies permitted to operate within Germany, such as the indigenous Caritas Verband, were not allowed to use imported supplies. When the Vatican attempted to transmit food supplies from Chile to German infants[59] the U.S. State Department forbade it.[59]
In early October 1945 the UK government privately acknowledged in a cabinet meeting that, German civilian adult death rates had risen to four times the pre-war levels and death rates amongst the German children had risen by 10 times the pre-war levels.[62] In early 1946 U.S. President Harry S. Truman finally bowed to pressure from Senators, Congress and public to allow foreign relief organization to enter Germany in order to review the food situation. In mid-1946 non-German relief organizations were finally permitted to help starving German children.[59] During 1946 the average German adult received less than 1,500 calories a day. 2,000 calories was then considered the minimum an individual can endure on for a limited period of time with reasonable health.[63] At this time food rationing was still strict in the UK and France and there were food shortages right across Europe. Bread rationing was first introduced to the UK in 1946 and potato rationing in 1947; these measures had not been in place during the war and partly reflect the need for food to be sent to the British and French zones of occupation.[64] However later research has revealed that the bread rationing in the UK was not necessary, it was in fact "not primarily for economic reasons – in order to save wheat – but for psychological and political reasons" as a political ploy in order to get US support in reconstruction funds and US wheat. Rationing did not reduce the level of food consumption in the UK.[65] In fact, the UK rationing let the UK "retain its privileged position as the only food importing country which did not suffer a significant reduction in calorie consumption."[65] The Germans in the UK zone were receiving half the UK ration.[65]
Senast redigerad av 1 knegon, redigerad totalt 24 gånger.
Re: "3.500 tyskbarn svältes medvetet ihjäl"
Det tycker jag också, ny tråd om Morgenthau alltså. Däremot så känner jag otroligt dåliga vibbar runt Wiki här.knegon skrev:Ja, man kan kanske inte lita hundra på wikipedia men tycker att relativt ofta verkar stämma och detta kanske borde läggas i en annan tråd dessutom.
Ta bara första stycket helt utan källor, och vi har redan visat att CARE paketen bara en månad efter de kom till Europa visst fick skickas till Tyskland. Matförstöring har vi vare sig källa eller syfte till, kan ha varit så enkelt att man inte ville ha människor grävandes i soporna - om det nu skulle stämma.knegon skrev:Germany was closed to relief shipments until December 1945. The given reasons were that they might tend to negate the policy of restricting the German standard of living. CARE package shipments to individuals remained prohibited until 5 June 1946. US troops and their families were also under orders to destroy their own excess food rather than letting German families have access to it.
MVH
Hans
Re: "3.500 tyskbarn svältes medvetet ihjäl"
Är förstås riktigt dåligt om det inte stämmer det som står på wikisidan eller om det är direkt felaktigt.
Tror redan det har funnits en tråd om Morgenthauplanen här på Skalman så det kanske inte behövs en till kanske snarare
någon tråd om Tyskland åren efter krigsslutet i sådant fall.
Mvh
Knegon.
Tror redan det har funnits en tråd om Morgenthauplanen här på Skalman så det kanske inte behövs en till kanske snarare
någon tråd om Tyskland åren efter krigsslutet i sådant fall.
Mvh
Knegon.
- B Hellqvist
- Redaktör emeritus
- Inlägg: 5627
- Blev medlem: 24 mars 2002, 16:05
- Ort: Skövde
- Kontakt:
Re: "3.500 tyskbarn svältes medvetet ihjäl"
När det gäller matförstöring erinrar jag mig att jag läste någonstans att amerikanska soldater förstörde ett lass överblivna apelsiner för att tyskarna inte skulle få tag på dem, men om det var en enskild händelse eller del av ett större mönster förtäljde inte historien.
Re: "3.500 tyskbarn svältes medvetet ihjäl"
I den tyska Wikiupplagan om Morgenthau hittar jag inget om att man förstörde mat för att hindra tyska civila att komma över den m m. Det verkar vara uppgifter exklusivt för engelsk- och svenskspråkiga Wiki.Hans skrev: Det tycker jag också, ny tråd om Morgenthau alltså. Däremot så känner jag otroligt dåliga vibbar runt Wiki här.
MVH
Hans
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthau-Plan
- B Hellqvist
- Redaktör emeritus
- Inlägg: 5627
- Blev medlem: 24 mars 2002, 16:05
- Ort: Skövde
- Kontakt:
Re: "3.500 tyskbarn svältes medvetet ihjäl"
Nej, det finns en risk att vissa Wikipediaartiklar passar bättre på Metapedia (nassevarianten av Wikipedia).Lasse Odrup skrev:I den tyska Wikiupplagan om Morgenthau hittar jag inget om att man förstörde mat för att hindra tyska civila att komma över den m m. Det verkar vara uppgifter exklusivt för engelsk- och svenskspråkiga Wiki.Hans skrev: Det tycker jag också, ny tråd om Morgenthau alltså. Däremot så känner jag otroligt dåliga vibbar runt Wiki här.
MVH
Hans
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthau-Plan
Re: Morgenthau planen
Att kolla de olika språkversionerna av Wiki var en bra idé.
Den franska saknar någon planerad svält:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Morgenthau
Likaledes den norska:
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthauplanen
Den nederländaka verkar värre än den svenska:
http://translate.google.be/translate?sl ... nthau-plan
MVH
Hans
Den franska saknar någon planerad svält:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Morgenthau
Likaledes den norska:
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthauplanen
Den nederländaka verkar värre än den svenska:
http://translate.google.be/translate?sl ... nthau-plan
MVH
Hans
- sonderling
- Stödjande medlem 2021
- Inlägg: 8020
- Blev medlem: 4 april 2002, 14:24
- Ort: Oxelösund
Re: Morgenthau planen
Bruno Manz nämner lite om detta i sin bok.
Det står att hans syster jobbade för de allierade men att hon var förbjuden att ta med nått hem i matväg.
Manz förklaring eller spekulation är denna; att det fanns så lite mat överhuvudtaget i ett förstört Europa att alla var tvungna att hushålla, även de allierade, som relativt sett levde i ett överflöd.
Han menar att vidare att Morganthauplanens korta hämd period avlöstes av en betydligt givmildare Marshall-plans period.
Nu omfamnar Manz det demokratiska USA väldigt intensivt efter sin tidigare Nazistiska livsperiod men det kan ju ligga nått i det han säger.
Sonderling
Det står att hans syster jobbade för de allierade men att hon var förbjuden att ta med nått hem i matväg.
Manz förklaring eller spekulation är denna; att det fanns så lite mat överhuvudtaget i ett förstört Europa att alla var tvungna att hushålla, även de allierade, som relativt sett levde i ett överflöd.
Han menar att vidare att Morganthauplanens korta hämd period avlöstes av en betydligt givmildare Marshall-plans period.
Nu omfamnar Manz det demokratiska USA väldigt intensivt efter sin tidigare Nazistiska livsperiod men det kan ju ligga nått i det han säger.
Sonderling